![]() |
| Source: static.pexels.com |
Obviously, things cannot just create themselves or appear out of thin air. That would be ludicrous. Imagine watching a movie with your family and all of a sudden a kangaroo appears on the couch next to you. You wouldn't think, "Oh, the kangaroo just appeared out of nothing." You would think, "Where did this kangaroo come from?!" This idea of asking where things came from is the basis for Aquinas' second proof of the existence of God.
This second proof deals with something called efficient cause. Efficient cause is a thing that brings about the being of another thing. That can be a confusing definition but basically what it means is that a person/object has to bring another person/object into existence. Something has to cause another thing to come into being. It is all about creation.
When most of us were in science classes at school, we were told that, "matter can be neither created or destroyed." This scientific ideal should make us pause and raise questions. If matter can be neither created or destroyed, where did all the matter around us come from? Science and logical thinking tell us that nothing can just appear out of thin air. Nothing can exist prior to itself. So we then we are led to think that nothing in this world is the cause of creating itself; something else had to have caused it. We can go back and try to explain away the efficient causes of everything leading up to the things here on earth, but like the argument of motion, we cannot continue into infinity with these arguments because the the cause of the creation of something must be created itself. Thus, we must conclude that there has to be a first cause, and this cause is what people call God.
I hope that some of you found this post to be helpful in explaining the second proof of God's existence. Comment below if there are any questions.
Your Sister in Christ,
Emily
This second proof deals with something called efficient cause. Efficient cause is a thing that brings about the being of another thing. That can be a confusing definition but basically what it means is that a person/object has to bring another person/object into existence. Something has to cause another thing to come into being. It is all about creation.
When most of us were in science classes at school, we were told that, "matter can be neither created or destroyed." This scientific ideal should make us pause and raise questions. If matter can be neither created or destroyed, where did all the matter around us come from? Science and logical thinking tell us that nothing can just appear out of thin air. Nothing can exist prior to itself. So we then we are led to think that nothing in this world is the cause of creating itself; something else had to have caused it. We can go back and try to explain away the efficient causes of everything leading up to the things here on earth, but like the argument of motion, we cannot continue into infinity with these arguments because the the cause of the creation of something must be created itself. Thus, we must conclude that there has to be a first cause, and this cause is what people call God.
I hope that some of you found this post to be helpful in explaining the second proof of God's existence. Comment below if there are any questions.
Your Sister in Christ,
Emily

